Are exhausted pilots flying our planes? Pilots union says “yes”

by Charlie Leocha on June 18, 2009

The president of the Airline Pilots Association, John Prater, had some sobering words about pilot fatigue before the Senate Subcommittee on Aviation, Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, yesterday. His testimony about the realities of a pilot’s life and duty time are eye-opening, to say the least.

Here are his comments in his own words from Senate Subcommittee testimony. Most interesting to me is the section on rest time between duty days.

“Fatigue may adversely affect every flight crewmember every time they fly. Due to airline economic conditions which require pilots to work longer days and more of them than ever before, fatigue has reached alarming levels within the industry. The FAA’s flight and duty time regulations are woefully inadequate to address today’s situation and have not significantly changed in over 60 years, since well before jet transports came into use in the late 1950s. The current U.S. flight and duty time rules are a patchwork of regulations that are intended to address disparate domestic, international flag, and supplemental operations. There have been a number of attempts to revise the regulations over the past 25 years, but those attempts have met with generally abysmal results because of the contentious disagreement by the stakeholders as to which changes were appropriate or needed.

One fact about pilot fatigue that is not widely known is that airline pilots frequently spend much more time at work each day than the number of hours recorded actually flying an airplane. This is especially true in the regional industry although the work schedules at the so-called “legacy carriers” are by no means free of these same concerns. Currently, airline pilots are routinely assigned duty days of up to 15 hours. During a typical 14- to 15-hour duty day, a pilot can expect to be assigned fewer than 8 hours of flying but up to 8 individual take offs and landings, in various types of weather and across multiple time zones. The time not flying may be spent performing duties such as checking weather, dealing with routing, dispatch and flight paperwork, overseeing aircraft loading and unloading, dealing with mechanical issues, waiting on the ground between flights, and similar activities. Thus, although a pilot may have only flown 7 or fewer flight hours by the end of a duty day, he or she could easily have been on duty 14 or 15 hours. This work pattern may be repeated over a period of several days. The weight of the scientific evidence accumulated over the last 20 or so years has firmly established that the vast majority of humans simply cannot be expected to reliably and safely perform operational tasks beyond 12 to 14 hours on duty. It cannot be overstated that pilots are making their most critical decisions on landings at the very end of their duty day which, due to unplanned circumstances, can easily be 20 hours or more since their last rest period. It is worth noting in this context that most fatal accidents occur during the landing phase of flight.

The airlines are required to give pilots only an 8-hour break after any duty day, regardless of its length. Unfortunately, this 8-hour minimum break does not provide an adequate opportunity for recuperative sleep because the break is not an opportunity for 8 hours of sleep, but rather a period of time away from the aircraft. During the 8-hour break, it is not unusual for a pilot to be left with a maximum 4 or 5 hours of sleep opportunity. This occurs because the FAA has defined all time away from the airplane (“release to report”) on a trip as “rest.” Incredible as it may seem, the time a pilot spends waiting for a hotel shuttle and going through airport security screening is defined as “rest” under the current FAA regulatory scheme. A pilot must also attend to all of his or her other non-work- related daily physical and nutritional needs and requirements during this 8-hour break away from the aircraft. It is not at all unusual for a pilot to elect to forego a meal so as not to further reduce their sleep opportunity. This situation is highly objectionable– sleep experts agree that most adults require 7 to 8 hours of sleep each night to meet their physiological needs and restore their alertness. Pilots need a longer, and genuine, daily rest period than is allowed under current regulations.

Another serious deficiency in current regulations is the failure to acknowledge circadian rhythms. Every human has an internal circadian cycle that determines sleep and wakefulness. Typical “circadian low” cycles (i.e., a period of reduced wakefulness and energy) will occur from approximately 3:00 to 5:00 a.m. and again from 3:00 to 5:00 p.m. Performance and alertness may be decreased during the nocturnal window, which is from approximately 2 a.m. until 6 a.m., depending on individual variability. Flight and duty regulations need to acknowledge this cycle.

Because the FAA’s present fatigue regulations are antiquated and outmoded, they have frequently been augmented by contractual work rules negotiated between pilots and their employers in the decades from 1960 to the mid 80’s. Through the restructuring of pilot contracts in corporate bankruptcies (note: over 160 U.S. airlines have gone through bankruptcy since 1980) and the complete absence of negotiated work rule improvements at many carriers, there has been non-uniform treatment of flight duty and rest limitations at the various airlines, leaving only the antiquated Federal Aviation Regulations to govern maximum duty days and minimum rest periods for thousands of airline pilots. Further exacerbating the problem is the fact that pilot wage rates and pensions were slashed by more than 30% in corporate bankruptcies forcing pilots to accept even more flights or face their own financial crisis. Fatigue provisions are rarely found within any pilot contract, especially within a regional airline agreement. Of the regional contracts that do have such provisions, only one of which we are aware allows a pilot to recoup his or her lost pay. All contracts of which we are aware contain real threats of disciplinary action if the company determines that a pilot’s claim of fatigue was fraudulent.

In recent times, there has been severe pressure on individual airlines to slash pilot staffing and reduce rest periods to minimum levels due to a belief that such actions would result in “productivity” increases necessary for economic survival. The demands for more monthly and yearly flight hours flown by fewer pilots has lead to endemic fatigue levels, and with fewer pilots staffed on reserve or standby duty for weather disruptions, pilots are forced to fly more flights to the upper limits of the FARs or watch as scheduled flights are cancelled for lack of available rested crews. The fatigue cushion once provided by negotiated work rules has been virtually eliminated largely due to a single-minded focus by airline managements on minimizing the labor costs associated with flight operations. This elimination of the fatigue protections once provided by negotiated work rules that were developed over decades of experience at most established air carriers means that today, for more and more pilots, the bare minimum protections afforded by the FAA flight and rest regulations have become a daily way of life.

The current cumulative effects of reduced rest resulting from working to minimum FAA limits, combined with the effect of personal financial stress and uncertainty brought about by nearly eight years of severe economic downtimes in the industry, have taken a severe toll upon pilots. Many pilots feel that they are just hanging on to a barely tolerable job instead of pursuing a once-promising career. Today’s airline pilot is typically working substantially more hours for less money and spending more hours away from home than his or her predecessors. In addition, regularly required training events are crammed on top of the monthly flight schedule often paying less than 3 hours of pay for 8 hours of training with none of that time counting towards the FAR flight time limits. The repeated attempts by airline managements in recent years to return U.S. airlines to an era of profitability by cutting labor costs continues to be paid for by the daily sacrifices and toil of airline pilots and other workers.”

Share:
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks

{ 9 comments… read them below or add one }

John June 18, 2009 at 8:22 am

Timeout … I’m confused. Who negoiates labor contracts for the pilots with the airlines? Isn’t it the union?

So as I read this statement, the union has done a disservice to it’s membership by allowing the “the complete absence of negotiated work rule improvements at many carriers.” Last time I checked, negoiating work rules is the job of the union not the FAA or the government.

Furthermore, I’m not sure that the pilots would want the change since the current financial situation has “[forced] pilots to accept even more flights or face their own financial crisis.” Wouldn’t a reduction in available flight hours result in an situation that results in a “financial crisis” for pilots? Last time I checked, financial stress increases not decreases fatigue.

When I read the last paragraph it sounds to me that the union has failed their membership. Pilots are being asked to do “more with less” which has become the mantra for most US businesses. Having failed to negoiate better work rules at the bargining table, the union is now looking for the FAA to do their bargining for them.

Interestingly, I didn’t see any studies or NTSB reports quoted. Wouldn’t that be a strong argument? “The NTSB recommended in XXXX after the crash of flight XXXXX resulting from pilot fatigue that the FAA reduce pilot work days to X hours per day.”

My neighbor is a PIC (captain) for a regional airline. Her airline allots schedules through a “bidding” process. She intentional bids for ugly schedules like those mentioned in the article in order to spend more time at home. As the primary bread winner in her house, she has to fly x hours a month to pay bills. She doesn’t agree with external regulation of her hours because they would force her to spend more time away from her daughters to make the same amount of money.

So this seems to me to be more of an issue of pilots work rules changing, like every other employee in corporate america, and being asked to do more with less than an issue of safety. Maybe the unions should take their fight to the bargining table. At the same time, based on their statement and the talking with my neighbor, pilots don’t seem to want a change in work rules that lowers their income for a given time away from home.

Frank June 18, 2009 at 8:44 am

This elimination of the fatigue protections once provided by negotiated work rules that were developed over decades of experience at most established air carriers means that today, for more and more pilots, the bare minimum protections afforded by the FAA flight and rest regulations have become a daily way of life.
========================================================

Now, you know why airline employees have such a contentious relationship with management. One interesting note here is that now that the pilot retirement age has been changed to 65, I wonder if there will be a correlation between age and the acumulative effects of LACK OF SLEEP (not reduced sleep). Furthermore, the MINIMUM REST PERIOD used to be a rare occurrence decades ago, nowadays, it’s common. Nice to know that the FAA is allowing the airline industry to sidestep the crew’s important ADEQUATE rest period in the name of profits.

LeeAnne June 18, 2009 at 11:25 am

What a timely article…on the same day that I read that a Continental pilot just DIED IN FLIGHT!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090618/ap_on_re_us/us_pilot_dies

Hmmm…can’t help but wonder if fatigue had anything to do with it. He was, after all, 61 years old. How many people in their 60′s can work for 20 hours straight on 4 hours sleep?

Robert June 18, 2009 at 11:57 am

Hours of service rules are complecated with severe penalties for carriers for violations. I know the rules for railroads and the way the rules are described in the article just don’t ring true to the way I suspect the actual FAA hours of service rules are written. There may be some fatigue issues but it sounds like the pilots union representative is presenting a skewed perspective of the issue.

Doug June 18, 2009 at 3:34 pm

Many of the practices that Capt. Prater is railing against have come about as a result of ALPA’s negotiations on behalf of its members. Most pilots want to fly as many hours as possible, in the shortest time possible. That maximizes blocks of days off and makes commuting a practical way of life. Lengthening rest periods would be more expensive for airlines (they would have to hire more pilots), but would also be resisted strenuously by pilots because it would significantly alter what they generally consider to be a very desirable lifestyle.

ALPA has the power currently to put model flight, duty, and rest requirements into place if it was really serious about these items. When push comes to shove, however, these issues always take a back seat to lifestyle and pay during negotiations. It’s all about the money.

The rest situation, as described by Capt. Prater, is accurate. Federal regulations allow for these inadequate rest periods, and they do occur. But they don’t occur every day. Pilot schedules tend to be mix of longer and shorter duty days and longer and shorter rest periods. Pilots are generally not working 14-16 hour days every day, followed by the bogus 8 hours of rest called for by federal regulations.

The problem of commuting pilots is very real, too. Pilots deny themselves adequate rest rather than change their lifestyle. Many do it on a regular basis. Further compounding this is the way in which the FAA has turned a blind eye to conflicts with military reserve flying. There are still siginifcant numbers of airline pilots who serve their country in military reserve units. None of the military flight time is figured into any of the flight or duty time limitations for commercial pilots. The FAA simply gives a knowing wink to the Department of Defense. This arrangement allows reservists to fly all night back from war zones, land, change uniforms, and report for work at an airline with no rest — and that’s perfectly legal and acceptable to the FAA.

Fatigue is a problem in the airline industry. It needs to be addressed comprehensively. Unfortunately, both airlines and pilot unions tend to be selective in the issues they want to address. The FAA, an agency whose senior leadership (with the exception of the newly appointed J. Randolph Babbitt) is surpisingly devoid of any practical aviation experience, is ill-suited in both knowledge and temperment to promulgate regulations that will address the fatigue issues comprehensively.

After reading some of the moronic comments made by the legislators being addressed by Capt. Prater, I suspect that they will do a lot of grand-standing, and perhaps introduce more ineffective and costly legislation. We will likely wind up with complicated changes to the rules that will not make us safer, will cost a lot of money, and leave everyone unhappy.

Former pilot's sister and nurse practitioner June 18, 2009 at 6:35 pm

My brother flew professionally for decades. He would come home on his first day off and sleep for almost 24 hours. The airline he worked for was good about honouring the rules but he and his colleagues were still exhausted most of the time. A different hotel room and bed every day, sometimes LOTS of noise in the hotel or outside, poor eating habits because of lack of available food (he always packed peanut butter sandwiches just in case) and almost no time to exercise and it all adds up to a VERY unhealthy lifestyle.

We KNOW that night work, rotating work hours, and lack of rest promote the release of cheicals that promote heart disease. We in the aviation business also know that the FAA Flight Surgeon system is a bad joke- all too many of these MDs are easy to bribe (they do the work ofr the money-$125/exam CASH- not for the altruism of protecting passengers) or are retired or semi competent to begin with.

I personally knew of one FAA certified flight surgeon who never ever took a blood pressure on pilots, he just wrote in an acceptable reading number; another who because he had beginning dementia, was removed from a hospital medical staff roster but moved to another state and continued pioy physicals; and two in different states who my hbrother went to (recommended by pilots) who took my brother’s money, passed him on the physical and never touched him!

The FAA only cares about the perception of safety – not the actual implementation of safe activities to prevent pilot fatigue or assure excellence in the flight surgeon program.

terry cummings June 18, 2009 at 9:33 pm

i think what needs to be done is scrap the minimum ‘rest’ period of 8 hours and substitute a period of free from all duty of at least 10 hours. i cannot recall how many times i had the minimum that allowed me to perhaps 3 hours of sleep following a duty day of 15 hours followed by another duty day of 16 hours.

Frank June 18, 2009 at 9:48 pm

On June 18th, 2009 at 8:22 am John said Timeout … I’m confused. Who negoiates labor contracts for the pilots with the airlines? Isn’t it the union?
So as I read this statement, the union has done a disservice to it’s membership by allowing the “the complete absence of negotiated work rule improvements at many carriers.” Last time I checked, negoiating work rules is the job of the union not the FAA or the government.
=========================================================

John, there are FAA mandated regulations in this industry. One being MINIMUM REST for crews. This is NOT something that is negotiated at the bargaining table. All airline companies MUST abide by these FAA RULES. Care to know or see that YOUR pilot worked a 13 hour day and got 9 hours on the ground in a hotel. Subtract time going to the hotel, getting up 2 hours before departure and they equates to maybe 6 hours sleep. It’s starting your day, FATIQUED.

Frank June 19, 2009 at 9:32 am

Former pilot’s sister and nurse practitioner said

I personally knew of one FAA certified flight surgeon who never ever took a blood pressure on pilots, he just wrote in an acceptable reading number; another who because he had beginning dementia, was removed from a hospital medical staff roster but moved to another state and continued pioy physicals; and two in different states who my hbrother went to (recommended by pilots) who took my brother’s money, passed him on the physical and never touched him!
==============================================================

Informative POST, Sis/Nurse.

I fly with a pilot all the time who can barely walk. Bad knees. And as a result, he’s also overweight. Upon arrival into the hotel for the overnight, he requests a room close to the elevator so he doesnt have to walk far. Further reducing his physical activity to exercise. Eats airport food and breathes heavily when he walks. I admire him alot and fear for his health. I wonder how some of these pilots pass their physicals.

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: